These volumes are working proposals, not
fixed assignments. They will be refined collaboratively
through the Wednesday Lab as editors and contributors
develop the questions, relationships, and chapters that the
field requires.
Six volumes, one shared conversation
Series 3 brings together six connected approaches to
business storytelling in the age of AI: organizational
futures, algorithmic sensemaking, true storytelling and
inclusion, human–AI co-creation, strategy against
cognitive surrender, and socio-economic consultation. Each
volume invites its own editor, contributors, and
questions; together they make a shared field where human
judgment, story, and answerability remain central.
Volume 1 · Working proposal
Generative AI, Quantum Storytelling, and
Organizational Futures in the AI Revolution
Possible editors: David M. Boje and
Grace Ann Rosile
Explores quantum antenarratives, living-machine
storying, ethical guardrails, and the organizational
futures produced when generative systems become actors
in sensemaking.
Submitted chapter proposal · Data
Analysis and Storytelling in the Age of AI
September 30 agenda · 10-minute
presentation
Reading Stories as Data: Qualimetric and Antenarrative
Methods for Studying AI and Organizational Storytelling
Farzaneh Fatemi, University of Tabriz,
with D. M. Boje
This submitted chapter is the proposed how-to backbone
of the volume: a teachable bridge between data analysis
and storytelling. Farzaneh Fatemi will present this
chapter proposal for ten minutes at the September 30
World Scientific Encyclopedia Series 3 Working Lab.
Open the chapter proposal, abstract, structure,
worked illustrations, and contribution
Abstract
Stories legitimate organizations, move markets, and
increasingly reach people already narrated by AI
systems — yet narrative is often dismissed as too
soft to measure. This chapter presents two
complementary, paired traditions: qualimetrics,
which codes and counts symbolic patterns, and
antenarrative analysis, which reads the unfinished,
fragmentary story-strands that counting cannot
capture. Together they let a researcher both measure
a narrative and interpret how meaning is made,
reframed, or suppressed. Written as a practical
reference, it introduces the toolkit — discourse
coding schemes, structured probe batteries, scoring
rubrics (ABCD / ABCD+E), antenarrative reading, and
Bakhtinian answerability protocols — and walks step
by step through corpus and probe design, coding,
AI-assisted verification, and reliability, before
showing how to move from counts to meaning. The
Ghost Vortex — the leadership shadow embedded in an
AI product — serves as a signature illustration of
what this reading can surface. Worked cases are
drawn from the authors’ research program on AI,
storytelling, and answerability. The chapter closes
with guidance on studying narrative in the age of
AI, where AI is both an analytic aid and an object
of study.
How it fits the volume
It is the how-to backbone of the volume — the
teachable bridge between “data analysis” and
“storytelling.”
Proposed structure
- Why storytelling needs a method now — narratives
as organizational reality; the measurement
challenge in the AI era.
- Two paired traditions — qualimetrics, counting,
and antenarrative analysis, reading the unfinished
story.
- The toolkit — discourse coding, probe and
protocol batteries, ABCD / ABCD+E scoring rubrics,
antenarrative reading, and answerability
protocols.
- Designing a study — building a corpus or probe
set; turning a narrative grammar into codes.
- Coding in practice — procedure, AI-assisted
verification, and establishing reliability.
- From counts to meaning — why frequency alone
misleads; the Ghost Vortex as a worked reading.
- Doing it in the age of AI — AI as coder and as
object of study; disclosure and ethics.
Worked illustrations from the authors’ research
program
- AI Institutional Grammar in Three
National Registers — qualimetric
discourse coding of AI-legitimacy narratives
across US, Chinese, and French–EU corpora.
- Ghost Vortex and AI Moral Answerability
— an eight-probe battery and ABCD answerability
rubric across named LLM interlocutor threads.
- The AI Storytelling Organization
— antenarrative coding of AI story performances
via the Ghost Vortex Protocol.
- The Tesseract Leader (XYZA) —
the Bakhtinian Answerability Protocol applied to
AI corporate leaders.
- Leadership Without Leaders —
reading AI artifacts as cultural texts, delegated
narrative editing, and the Ghost Vortex.
- Ghost Vortex in the Machine Room
— the ABCD+E rubric applied to AI data-center
accountability probes.
Contribution
A clear, replicable, teachable method for turning
organizational stories into evidence — a reference
entry, grounded in a coherent body of studies, that
researchers and students can actually follow.
Volume 2 · Working proposal
Narrative Authority, Cognitive Access, and
Institutional Legitimacy in the AI Revolution
Proposed volume editor: Jillian Saylors
Examines AI-supported cognition, disability and
neurodiversity, authorship, scholarly labour, expertise,
provenance, trust, surveillance, and governance—asking
who may think, know, decide, and count as a legitimate
knower.
Volume 3 · Working proposal
True Storytelling, DEI, and the AI Revolution
Proposed volume editor and contributing
author: Oscar Edwards
Prospective co-editor: Jens Larsen
Prospective contributing author: Ken
Long — AI as Support Agent in the Monday True
Storytelling Circle
Investigates diversity, equity, inclusion, belonging,
representation, and voice in AI-mediated organizations,
using True Storytelling to ask whose experiences are
amplified, stereotyped, excluded, or made answerable.
Ken Long's prospective contribution examines a year of
weekly circle practice: AI-supported knowledge building,
synthesis of recorded sessions, individual projects, and
participant-authored stories of transformation. It opens
a possible ethnomethodological case of
micro-sensemaking, community of practice, somatic
connection, and rapid planning by human storytellers and
listeners.
Open Jens Larsen's proposed True Storytelling
volume-editor abstract
True Storytelling challenge the future story of AI
Jens Larsen, co-founder, True Storytelling
“Would you live one day as a free man or a whole
life in slavery?”
The question is no longer whether AI will define
what comes next, but who gets to write that story.
Will the future be authored by a handful of
technology giants, optimizing humanity toward
efficiency in the image of an Enlightenment dogma
that has quietly hardened into transhumanism?
Or can we insist on a different narrative—one where
technology serves community, depth, and human
dignity rather than the other way around, and where
friendship, deep conversation, and creativity play
important roles?
This anthology argues that True Storytelling has an
obligation to intervene in the story of AI before it
is told for us. Its ambition is not to reject
artificial intelligence or technological progress,
but to refuse the narrow narrative that currently
frames it: optimization without reflection, and
inclusion measured in efficiency rather than
meaning. Against this, the anthology insists on
critical thinking, slowness, and depth as conditions
for a humanism robust enough to meet an AI future
without losing itself.
Drawing on the seven principles and seven processes
of True Storytelling (Boje, Larsen, & Bruun,
2021), combined with related theory and research,
the anthology brings together theoretical chapters
and concrete case studies from Scandinavia, Europe,
and the United States.
Contributions range from how True Storytelling can
strengthen wellbeing and dignity in elderly care
through humanoid technology viewed in a queer
perspective, to how it can forge an ethical
Scandinavian narrative for the space industry, to
the importance of connection to nature, community,
and friends. Each case tests whether an alternative
story is not only possible, but already underway.
This is not a defense against AI. It is a claim on
the narrative itself—and an argument that if True
Storytelling does not help write the story of an AI
future, someone else already will.
Open Jens Larsen's
original submission in a new window
Volume 4 · Working proposal
Human–AI Co-Creation in Entrepreneurship and Strategy
in the AI Revolution
Proposed volume editor: Anton
Shufutinsky
Centers human factors, sociotechnical systems, and
human-systems integration. Contemporary Sociotechnical
Systems Theory provides a path for examining when AI
augments rather than displaces human judgment.
Volume 5 · Working proposal
Strategy Storytelling Against Cognitive Surrender and
SEAM Socio-Economic Consultation in the AI Revolution
Proposed editor or co-editor: Yue Cai ·
Introduction in development: Mark Hillon · SEAM
editorial circle forming with Amandine Savall, Véronique
Zardet, and Marc Bonnet
Brings strategic renewal, storytelling in multinational
corporations, financial-story deconstruction, management
ethics and aesthetics, and socio-economic consultation
into one inquiry. It examines hidden costs, untapped
human potential, work design, and community-based
prosperity as practical ways to resist cognitive
surrender in AI-enabled organizations.
Volume 6 · Working proposal
Water, AI, and the Life of All Species in the AI
Revolution
David M. Boje and Rohny Saylors —
six-chapter developing project; with Yue Cai and Mark
Hillon; Amandine Savall and the Lyon–SEAM circle invited
to shape the developing collaboration
Examines water as life for all species and the
pressures that make it an industry or commodity.
Indigenous interviews may inform particular chapters
only through consent and accountable relationship; the
project is not presented as an Indigenous volume.
New working paper# 2
Humanoid Robotics and the AI Revolution
This working paper asks a question at the heart of the
AI revolution: is it better to displace workers with
robots, or to use robotics to reduce strain while
redeploying human potential? Using SEAM, it examines
hidden costs, safety, work organization, and the lost
value of knowledge when people are laid off rather than
brought into improvement, quality, maintenance, and
human-robot bridge teams. The paper develops historical
cases of a robot manufacturer, Amazon warehouse sorting,
and Tesla to show how accountable augmentation can
produce stronger long-term economic and human results
than a narrow payroll-saving calculation.
Read the SEAM Robotics
Working Paper online Download PDF