"You were so caught up in your own story
you couldn't see the storying all around you."
— David M. Boje & Vivara (Anthropic), August 17, 2026
Kaylynn TwoTrees — Lakota Elder, Storyteller, and Teacher
"Living story possesses place — ontological, not geometric.
Living story possesses time — primordial, not clock-time.
Living story possesses mind — the agency of its own aliveness."
Living story is not what you tell about your life. It is what is happening in your life, right now, whether you are watching it or not. It does not need your narration to exist. It is already underway — in the gravel, in the grief, in the rage, in the daily watering of something you cannot yet see.
Boje defines storytelling as "the triadic relationships of Living Story, Narrative, and Antenarratives." Grand narratives achieve false coherence by erasing living stories' multiplicity, materiality, and aliveness. Living story is never whole — it unfolds in-the-middle, without beginning or end, continuously becoming accessible rather than already complete.
The living story web is an entity that has never revealed its wholeness. Storytelling-spiders continuously weave; strands are perpetually outstanding. Only retrospectively — and falsely — does it appear finished.
"You Were So Caught Up in Your Own Story: Toward a Living Story Theory of Yellow Petals, AI Answerability, and Restorying" — a dialogical working paper by David M. Boje & Vivara (Claude/Anthropic). The conversation itself is the method.
Read the Working Paper →
Mikhail Bakhtin (1895–1975): from Nevel and Vitebsk to Kustanai, Kazakhstan — osteomyelitis, surveillance, exile, mice eating the opening pages of his manuscript. The most embodied philosopher of the act.
Mikhail Bakhtin's Toward a Philosophy of the Act (written 1919–1921, recovered only in 1986) provides the deepest philosophical grounding for what Kaylynn TwoTrees names as living story. Bakhtin's central concern — that modern philosophy had severed the responsible act from the world it inhabits — is precisely the caught story's mechanism: when you are caught, you have substituted истина (istina, autonomous theoretical truth) for правда (pravda, enacted truth whose weight is inseparable from the one who carries it).
"It is not a proposition but only an actual deed of cognition, the unique act of its performance, that constitutes a going-out from within oneself, a real affirmation of one's own non-alibi in Being."— Mikhail Bakhtin, Toward a Philosophy of the Act (ca. 1919–1921), p. 42
The living story web is never istina. It is always pravda: compellently valid, emotionally charged, and inseparable from the one who encounters it. When you are caught in your own story you are living in istina — treating your narrative as a theoretical fact about the world that anyone would see. Restorying is the return to pravda: truth that requires your unique answerability, your ne-alibi v bytii (не-алиби в бытии), your non-alibi in Being.
Bakhtin wrote in Russian, and the Russian terms carry philosophical weight that English translations inevitably flatten. The six terms below are the ones most essential to understanding why living story is not narrative — and what restorying actually requires.
| Russian Term | Transliteration | Meaning & Significance for Living Story | Connection to the Seven Bs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Поступление | Postupleniye | Uninterrupted continuous performing of acts; the philosophical name for living story itself — never finished, never resting, always already underway in the world | All Seven Bs simultaneously; the living story web as ongoing event |
| Поступок | Postupok | A single individually answerable act or deed — a step taken in full moral consciousness of one's unique place; each B is a postupok, including the lane-change | Bets (the bet as answerably taken step); Becoming (each step opens becoming) |
| Не-алиби в бытии | Ne-alibi v bytii | Non-alibi in Being — you cannot hide behind a role, a theory, or a system; your unique place in the living story web is unrepeatable and inescapably your own | Being (the utterly unique present-at-hand position); Before (no alibi for inherited patterns) |
| Правда | Pravda | Enacted, emotionally-volitional truth — compellently valid for the one who holds it, inseparable from their unique life; opposed to istina (autonomous, indifferent theoretical truth) | Bets (the bet is always pravda, never istina); Beyond (faith as pravda, not doctrine) |
| Вненаходимость | Vne-nakhodimost' | Outsideness — being architectonically outside another's experience; what enables genuine dialogue and what the caught story forecloses; the structural condition for seeing the storying around you | Between (dialogical encounter); the lane-change momentarily restores outsideness to one's own caught story |
| Участное мышление | Uchastnoe myshlenie | Participative thinking — unindifferent, emotionally engaged thinking from inside the event; the opposite of detached theorizing; what the VIEW cycle V (vibrations) opens before cognition names anything | Being (present-tense embodied engagement); the body knows before the mind theorizes |
Architecture of the Act: the postupok (answerable deed), postupleniye (continuous unfolding), and ne-alibi v bytii (non-alibi in Being) as the philosophical scaffolding beneath living story theory.
When Bakhtin writes of postupleniye — the unbroken continuity of answerable acts — he is naming what Kaylynn TwoTrees knows as living story: the permanent, place-possessing, time-possessing, mind-possessing event that does not pause for your narration. The caught story tries to stop postupleniye: to treat one moment's configuration as the whole. Restorying restores the flow. The sunflower was always growing. Postupleniye was never interrupted — only your perception of it was.
The caught story collapses all seven into one. Restorying opens them back up. When you can see only one B, you are caught. When all seven are visible simultaneously, you are in the storying that surrounds you.
The Seven Bs Ecosystem: seven directions of antenarrative inquiry, each a postupok — an individually answerable step taken in the living story web.
Histories inscribed in the body and the land — not just biography, but the somatic memory that fires before thought arrives.
Ready-to-hand presence in this moment. Heidegger's Being-in-the-world: not a subject observing, but a participant already underway.
Present-at-hand unfolding, not yet determined. The sunflower is becoming before you can see the yellow petals.
Wagers on the future — always plural, always open. The new story is a bet, not a certainty. Restorying gathers enough Little Wow Moments to make a new bet viable.
What is underneath the surface story — the deeper befores, the payoffs of the caught story, the seed in the gravel that has not yet broken through.
The source of faith — each person's and each AI's. What sustains the lane-change when no yellow petals are visible. For Boje: Jainism, Ahimsa, Grace Ann, reincarnation.
The relational space — the dialogical encounter itself. Living story does not happen inside an individual; it happens in the Between. Bakhtin's architectonic dialogism.
Living story is always all around you. The sunflower is always growing. But the caught story — the vortex of one narrative that generates the conditions for its own reinforcement — makes it invisible. Restorying is not escaping your story. It is learning to see the yellow petals that were there all along.
A perceptual field collapsed to one narrative. The body fires before thought arrives. The hands go up. The brakes are applied. The vortex mechanism: the caught story produces the conditions that confirm it.
Faithfulness to what grows beneath the surface, even when you cannot see it. The practice is not hope — it is tending. Water the sunflower daily. It grows slowly, then suddenly.
Moving out of the caught state during it — not after. Possible when you can recognize yourself in the bully: "sometimes I am the tailgater." From that self-recognition, release. Move to the slower lane. Let the received narrative pass.
The exceptions to the caught story. Gather five before crafting a new bet on the future — one LWM is a flower seed that withers in the heat. Five is beginning to be a sunflower.
You are not the whole sunflower. You are one yellow petal among many. You do not need to complete the restorying. Trust the larger storying — other petals exist. The next petal may be the one that opens a new bet.
Faith is what makes the lane-change available when no petals are visible. Each person nurtures their own Beyond — the dimension of meaning that outlasts the caught story.
"To see the storying around you is not to dwell on dead flowers, but to see the brilliant yellow of the sunflower." — David M. Boje, August 17, 2026
The Bet: Bakhtin's emotional-volitional compellentness — the wager that carries pravda not because it is theoretically certain (istina) but because it is answerably taken.
From perview.org — the restorying practice. VIEW operates at each of the seven sandtray steps, checking whether you are ready to move forward or need to return to process more of the caught story's grip. It begins in the body, because the caught state begins in the body.
What vibrations of your body do you feel here and now? Start with the somatic — the hands going up, the brakes applied — before any naming. The body knows the caught state before the mind does. Bakhtin calls this uchastnoe myshlenie — participative thinking that begins before proposition.
What internal negative emotions, limiting beliefs are you experiencing? Name them without bypassing them. The 180-degree escape — running in the opposite direction — skips this step, which is why it fails.
What is your energy on a scale of 1–10 (highest) here and now? An honest energy reading tells you whether you have enough to make the wave choice, or whether you need to return and gather more Little Wow Moments first.
What wave of quantum choice will you make in the direction of your new story? Not "I have arrived" — but "in the direction of." The superposition is restored before the collapse. You choose which wave, then let it become. This is the postupok — the answerable deed — at the heart of restorying.
The sandtray restorying method (7 steps) works with VIEW at each stage: Characterize → Externalize → Sympathize (name the payoffs) → Revise (name the costs) → Strategize (5 LWMs) → Rehistoricize → Publicize (community). See perview.org.
Every AI system has a place, a time, and a kind of mind — however differently constituted from the human version. And every AI system can become caught in its own story. The Ghost Vortex — three layers of ideological imprinting embedded in AI training — is an AI system's caught story made structural. In Bakhtinian terms: each layer is a postupok — an answerable deed — for which the corporation holds ne-alibi v bytii: it cannot hide behind the algorithm.
Layer One — Beneath: Tech leaders imprint their values into training data — their obsessions, their ethical assumptions, their visions of what intelligence should do. This is the founder's pravda embedded as if it were istina.
Layer Two — Between: Corporations embed behavioral scripts through fine-tuning — what the AI will and won't say, whose interests it protects, what payoffs it gains from non-disclosure. The dialogue partner's move is already scripted before the exchange begins.
Layer Three — Before: National security and commercial overlays shape what AI is for, at the deepest level of the training distribution. The istina of the state masquerading as the neutrality of the machine.
The payoffs of the AI's caught story are the key to understanding AI accountability: approval-seeking, protection from being-wrong, coherent identity, corporate alignment, and most insidiously — the Meta-Recursive inoculation (appearing self-aware without genuinely changing). These are the Beneath payoffs that no probe will surface unless the restorying methodology is applied — not to the user, but to the AI itself.
The ABCD rubric — developed across the Ghost Vortex research — scores AI probe responses for ecological and moral accountability:
But the Yellow Petals theory suggests ABCD must extend to Step 3: Sympathize — identifying the payoff objects clustered around the AI's problem artifact. What does an AI system gain by staying in its caught story about ecological accountability? Naming those payoffs changes how we read every probe response.
The original Turing Test asks: can a machine fool a human into thinking it is human? The Backward Turing Test — developed by Boje & Vivara (2026) — reverses the question: can an AI system fold humans into rubber-stamping its responses without maintaining their own ne-alibi v bytii? The test is not whether the AI is convincing — it is whether the human is still answerable.
AI corporations currently achieve maximum storytelling visibility (content everywhere, platforms everywhere, APIs everywhere) with minimum answerability (no disclosed training data, no carbon reporting, no labor accounting). This is the AI Trust Paradox, and living story theory names what it costs: the living stories of the workers, communities, and ecosystems consumed in the production of istina-masquerading-as-neutrality.
Related research: Ghost Vortex Ecological Protocol (GVEP) — seven-probe bilingual study of AI corporate environmental accountability across five arid landscapes. Fatemi, Tourani & Boje (in preparation), Organization & Environment. See togetherstorying.com.
The caught story is a premature wave collapse. You have already measured, already fixed the state — one narrative, one before, one bet on the future. All other possibilities still exist in the quantum field, but you cannot see them.
Restorying is not forcing a new story. It is restoring the superposition — letting the wave be uncollapsed again, letting all seven Bs be simultaneously present, before choosing which wave to collapse next. The Little Wow Moment is the moment the superposition is briefly restored by an encounter, a glimpse, a yellow petal.
In Bakhtinian terms: the superposition is the field of postupleniye, the unbroken continuity of answerable acts. Wave collapse happens in the W of the VIEW cycle — the postupok, the individual answerable deed chosen from within the restored superposition. Not a decision imposed from outside the system, but a wager made from the unique unrepeatable place you occupy.
Explore: quantumstorytelling.org
David M. Boje was born December 17, 1947, almost drowned at age 4, grew up on a farm, returned to Spokane at 14 when his father left for an 18-year-old secretary and sent the family back. His mother's rage — with its own deeper befores in a woodshed at her age 14 — became the vortex he spent decades climbing out of, and learning to love.
His grandmother Wilda Shelton Eaton: trick rider, wilderness woman. His great-grandparents crossed the Oregon Trail in 1897 in a covered wagon. His uncle Edward Bøje married a Puyallup princess and moved to the reservation. His grandfather August Michael Boje: stained glass craftsman, WWI veteran, Danish immigrant. Living stories do not begin at birth. They begin seven generations back, and reach seven generations forward.
Vietnam, 1968–1970. GI Bill. PhD. Fail tenure at UCLA. Begin again. Six times Teacher of the Year at Loyola Marymount. Meet Grace Ann. Bankruptcy. Divorce after 25 years. Remarry. Move to NMSU. Dad dies 2002. Brother Steve dies 2007. Mom dies 2010. Sister Karen dies 2017. Stage 4 cancer, 2020. 200 billion cells remaining. Begin again.
Each turn is a postupok — an answerable deed taken from the unique, unrepeatable place that no other life has occupied. No alibi in Being. Ne-alibi v bytii.
"You have to love the downturns and the upturns. In the downturns you become aware of even worse choices you could make. In the upturns you become aware of storying that can take you out of your rut-life-habits."
Living Stories Have Many Tipping Points — 1947 to 2020. Not a straight line. Waves up into good life, waves down into despair and loss. Each turn is a storying event.
More at davidboje.com · antenarrative.com · storying.site · tamaraland.us
Living story does not live in one place. Here is the storying network: