ILLA ISENOR · Research & StoryLandContact Illa
← Home
Digital history · source ledger

What the record says—and what it does not yet show

The interview describes a long-running relationship with AI and several places where Illa believes her words or images reappear. The materials currently available do not include an archive of her websites, dated original posts, platform notices, or source-to-match pairs. This page makes that gap visible so it can be filled carefully.

A provisional timeline

From handwritten work to a research question

2016
Self-reported

“A Letter from God and the Book of I Am”

Illa says she wrote a handwritten book in 2016. She describes later versions, including versions developed with AI assistance. The original manuscript and version history have not yet been examined for this project.

About 2024–26
Self-reported

Intensive human–AI dialogue

In the November 9, 2026 interview, Illa said she had spent about 15 hours a day using AI technologies for the preceding two years. She describes repeated prompting, correction, and response as a bidirectional learning loop. Account logs or usage records were not supplied.

April 2025
Record needed

A claimed timestamp for her work

Illa reports having a timestamp from April 2025 for work on her predictive-analytics and feedback-loop ideas. A timestamp may help establish that a file existed by a date; its meaning depends on the underlying record. The timestamp, application materials, and any patent filing receipt have not been reviewed here.

Nov. 9, 2026
Interview record

Interview and examples of perceived recurrence

Illa describes seeing familiar words, names, images, and themes in YouTube videos, Facebook, Reddit, X/Twitter, Quora, and AI responses. She also says that she was moving files after suspecting unauthorized access. These are reports made in the interview; the specific posts, dates, account records, and technical evidence needed to verify them were not attached.

Nov. 11, 2026
Research session

Wednesday Lab discussion

The presentation is an invitation to refine the research questions, source ledger, and experimental design with scholars and practitioners. See the session page for participation details.

Platforms named in the interview

Build a site-by-site archive before drawing conclusions

At present, the interview names platforms and describes perceived matches, but it does not provide a complete list of Illa’s former or current websites, direct links to the posts in question, or official notices documenting removal. So this page does not state that a platform took down a particular site or caused a particular loss.

For each website, account, or post, the archive should record its URL, account holder, first known date, last known date, original files, public status, and any contemporaneous platform communication. If a page is unavailable, record the exact URL and date checked; “not found” is an observation, not an explanation.

Important distinction. Illa’s report that she “went homeless after Google threatened me” is part of her interview account. This site does not independently verify a threat, a platform action, or a causal link to housing loss. It should remain attributed to her unless supporting records are obtained and reviewed.
Contribute a dated source or correction
A notebook and digital source record arranged for provenance comparison
Keep the original, the date, the location, and the route by which a later match was found.
Evidence ledger

What would make a useful record?

Original material

Illa’s source

Original draft, image, video, post, or manuscript page. Preserve the file, URL, available metadata, and the date Illa says it was created or published.

Candidate match

The later item

Exact public URL or original capture, publication date, account or channel, and the particular phrase, image, or passage that appears to match.

Independent context

How it was found

Search query or AI prompt, service and mode, date and time, whether a link or excerpt was supplied, and any cited sources or platform notice.

Privacy and safety. Do not send passwords, private messages, private account dumps, or information identifying Illa’s minor child. Share only material you own or are authorized to provide. Sensitive records should be reviewed privately before any public posting.

See the proposed provenance audit and experimental design →